Judging by the crowd’s reaction to the game yesterday, you’d have thought it was Game 7 of the World Series or something (of course, I’m finding out that I kind of treat every game like Game 7 of the World Series, which probably isn’t the healthiest thing to do). I suppose it was a relief to the frustration of the last three games (where we had the lead and lost it due to an uncharacteristically rocky bullpen). I was at work during yesterday’s game, but I managed to catch the re-airing of it and it can pretty much be summed up as bottom-of-the-ninth heroics followed by a complete meltdown of the Chicago bullpen in the twelfth. For some reason I just can’t get as excited about yesterday’s win as I should be. I see two explanations. The first is completely unrelated to baseball. A few days ago I did something I probably shouldn’t have, lied about it, and then got away with it for the time being, at least (it wasn’t anything illegal or something like that, but I still feel kinda guilty). The second explanation is that Pudge did not play for most of the game, and Rabelo has yet to impress me (He’s made three starts and still hasn’t gotten a hit). I’m hoping it’s the first explanation and not the second, because otherwise I’m pinning my enthusiasm for the Tigers on one particular player, and I don’t wanna do that regardless of who it is (though pinning it on a player whose contract will be up soon is even more unwise), because eventually they’ll all be gone in one way or another (granted, for some this won’t be for several more years, but it’ll happen). One of the great things about the Tigers is that they can really share the wealth as far as being the heroes of a particular game. So far this year, Granderson, Pudge, Polanco, Guillen, Ordoñez, Monroe, Inge, and Marcus Thames have all had big games. I think that speaks well for the team, because it shows that they DON’T have to rely on just one or two players, even though right now the offense isn’t quite where it should be. On that note, however, I was looking at the box scores for yesterday’s game, and I did notice that Detroit and Chicago actually have similar batting averages, and each team currently has only one player batting above .300 (Placido Polanco & Jim Thome), though there are a few who are flirting with that number. Obviously the heroes of yesterday’s game were Polanco and Thames (and to a lesser extent Guillen for getting the base hit before Thames hit the home run, and you could even give Pudge a tiny bit of credit since he’s technically the one whose run won the game, though he originally reached first base on his first walk of the season). At any rate, despite my lack of enthusiasm that even I can’t explain, it is an important win. We avoided the sweep, we’ve avoided dropping down to .500, and we’ve leapfrogged ahead of Chicago in the Central Division standings, for now, at least.
I have a few more notes and observations about this weekend’s series. First is that Jose Mesa is now on the disabled list, and he’s been replaced by Aquilino Lopez (who was playing for Toledo before he was called up). While I feel bad that Mesa was injured, his pitching has been definitely less-than-stellar. Lopez had an impressively solid outing on Friday. He did give up that home run yesterday, but I’m still excited to see what else he can do. Meanwhile, Ledezma and Zumaya continue to be on top of their game, and Todd Jones seems to have recovered from the last KC game. Rodney’s still kind of in a slump, though. He was really good last year, so I don’t want Leyland giving up on him yet. However, maybe he shouldn’t be pitching in high-pressure situations for a while. Durbin (who bears a slight resemblance to Leonardo DiCaprio) was actually pretty decent in Friday’s game, but they apparently left him in for one inning too many. My next observation is that during yesterday’s game, as Polanco was coming to the plate (right before he won the game for the Tigers), the public address system at Comerica was playing what sounded like a mariachi band performing “Hava Nagila.” This isn’t the first time I’ve heard this. They played it during the KC game last week (the one where Pudge hit the Grand Slam) as Ordoñez was coming to the plate. It was strange enough that my dad (who was in the room but not watching the game) turned around and asked me if there were any Jewish players there. My third observation is that with his brief appearance behind the plate yesterday, Pudge has now caught in 1,951 games, the fourth-highest total ever for any MLB player (he’ll probably reach the 2,000 mark and claim the “third-highest” slot before the end of the season, provided he doesn’t get injured). And no, I did not have that factoid memorized prior to last weekend. I got the information from TV and from the newspaper. My fourth observation is actually an observation on myself, and the way I refer back to previous games, and that is that they’re starting to sound like titles for episodes of Friends (“The One Where Pudge Hit a Grand Slam,” “The One Where Marcus Thames Homered to Keep the Tigers Alive,” “The One Where the Wind Had Fun Toying with Maggs,” etc). Using dates would probably be more efficient, but even I’m not hardcore enough to come up with the specific dates of games off the top of my head (plus, I would probably have to accompany the dates with some description anyways). My fifth observation is that Gary Sheffield was the only non-pitcher on the roster to not show up in yesterday’s game at some point. My final observation is that the Tigers have hit four Grand Slams already this season (though the last one was to no avail, as the Tigers ended up losing later). According to the Esurance factoid that FSN provided during the game yesterday, the last time the Tigers hit four Grand Slams in a single month was June of 1968. You know what else the Tigers did in 1968, don’t you?
The Tigers begin a very short and very strange away trip today. They play the Angels in a night game and a day game, then head to Chicago for two games (Geez, they won’t even be in California for 48 hours; if Chicago beats them, am I allowed to blame jet lag?). One minor amusing note that I have is that it’s currently warmer here in Toledo than it is in Anaheim. Tonight’s game is very late indeed for us Eastern Time Zoners: 10:05 PM. Luckily, my 9:30 AM Psychology class is cancelled tomorrow, so I CAN watch the game with a minimum of sleep deprivation (and I’m not lying this time). Mike Maroth will be pitching for the Tigers against Jered Weaver of the Angels, who is considered to be a good pitcher (from what I can tell) but has never faced the Tigers (I’ve also just found out that the Angels are at .500, which ties them for first place in the West Division; either the teams on the west coast are really beating each other up or the West Division is really anemic). Once again, online game previews seem to be handing this one to the Angels, mostly on the basis that Angel Stadium was the only west coast venue that the Tigers did not have a winning record in last year (and they think that Weaver is a better pitcher than Maroth). I’d like to point out that the Tigers currently have a better record than the Angels, and I’m going to stick to my belief that the Tigers’ll eventually make the offense more consistent (personally, I’m starting to think the boys are currently trying too hard and they need to relax a little). Maybe the day off for Sheffield’ll help him (hey, even though Sheff’s struggling, I think we still got the better end of the deal, cuz the guy we traded to the Yankees had to have Tommy John surgery and is out for the season). The good vibes from yesterday’s game (I may not have ‘em, but I’m pretty sure the Tigers do) should help as well. And hopefully I’ll be more excited this time.
I found out today that the UT Campus Police needs to take some English classes. There are signs all over campus today that say “WANTED: VANDALIZERS.” According to the fine print, someone stole two flags from a display case in the Student Union. First of all, that’s theft, not vandalism. Second of all, someone who commits an act of vandalism is referred to as a “vandal,” not a “vandalizer,” which is not even a word.
Recent Comments