Month: February 2004

  • BEST PICTURE


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
    • Lost in Translation
    • Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World
    • Mystic River
    • Seabiscuit

     


    Erin’s Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King


    Marisa’s Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Chicago


     


    Obviously, you should not have been surprised by this pick. If you were, you are: a) new to my site (in which case, welcome and enjoy yourself); b) not paying attention (in which case, please do so); or c) really dumb, dense, or both. A movie like this is a landmark achievement, a cinematic feat, one that is rarely done, and that in itself deserves to be rewarded. Even though all signs point to Return of the King as becoming the first fantasy movie to win Best Picture, I can’t help but be nervous (and along with that, I can’t help but antagonize Mystic River, Lost in Translation, and to some extent Seabiscuit and even Master and Commander, even though the latter is not really a threat; from what I’ve heard, Mystic River is really the only one that has any chance of an upset). This is only the second time that my pick is the front-runner. The first was Titanic, which I explained about in my last post (and my mom surprised me last night by complimenting Titanic, saying that the subject matter was well-handled and presented along with a good storyline; she even went so far as to say one of its good points is that it’s “not cheesy,” which is funny because the reason Marisa doesn’t like it is because she thinks it is cheesy). However, Titanic, being a historical epic, has many precedents (i.e. Ben-Hur, Lawrence of Arabia, Braveheart). LOTR, being a fantasy epic, doesn’t have any precedents, but, as some critics have pointed out, there’s a first time for everything (hell, it took 74 years for a black woman to win Best Actress). So I will be cheering it on tonight and if by some chance it doesn’t win, well, expect me to be rather bitchy for the next several days.


     


    ---


     


    I thought I’d say a few things about my expectations for the ceremony tonight. I know Billy Crystal is hosting. I prefer Whoopi Goldberg myself, but Billy Crystal’s okay, I guess. He’s certainly better than Steve Martin. The only thing that really bugs me about Billy Crystal is his gimmick where he inserts himself into the movies nominated for Best Picture. I’ve always found that more embarrassing than funny. The only one I ever thought was funny was when he inserted himself into The English Patient with David Letterman in the plane shouting “Introduce Oprah to Uma.” The rest have always seemed creepy to me, and tonight will probably be no exception. I do usually find his songs about the nominees funny, though.


     


    Other stuff:



    • I want them to bring back the tradition of showing a clip from the movie the actor or actress was in when they read the nominees. I missed that last year.
    • On the flipside, I hope they get rid of that stupid “Sounds of Oscar” thing that they did last year. That was not interesting at all. It was just a shot of the winner when their name was called, and the only difference is that they use the mike on the camera instead of on the stage. Clapping can only be so interesting.

     


    I found out a few weeks ago that Blake Edwards is getting the Honorary Oscar (actually, that should interest Marisa). I didn’t even know he was still alive (Speaking of which, the memorial tribute is bound to be long this year. So many big names died last year).


     


    I thought this article was interesting.


     


    That’s all for tonight. I will try to put up my post-mortems sometime tomorrow.

  • BEST DIRECTOR


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Sofia Coppola (Lost in Translation)

    • Clint Eastwood (Mystic River)

    • Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King)

    • Fernando Meirelles (City of God)

    • Peter Weir (Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World)

     


    Erin’s Pick: Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King)


    Marisa’s Pick: Peter Jackson (The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King)


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Roman Polanski (The Pianist)


     


    In any other year, I’d probably be rooting for Sofia Coppola, even though I don’t think Lost in Translation would really be my cup of tea (and then there’s the fact that the cinema purists love it, which automatically causes me to become hypercritical; they did the same thing with Adaptation last year), just because it would be cool to have a woman finally win Best Director. However, she had either the bad luck or bad judgment to release her movie in 2003, and I overwhelmingly give my kudos to Peter Jackson (and even though 99.9% of critics are predicting his win, I still feel a little nervous that he won’t; but that’s why awards shows are kept secret nowadays).


     


    ---


     


    Well, last night I went to the first concert of the Denison New Music Festival, because I had to go for two of my classes. Mandy was there, and she invited me to be on her radio show later that night, provided I bring my CDs. It was fun. I went on the air a little bit, and she let me play two Styx songs. I ended up bringing the vast majority of my CDs (not including “The Grand Illusion,” since I couldn’t find it, which sucks because I wanted to play “Castle Walls” for Liz), and we certainly had an interesting mix. At one point she played Evanescence’s “Haunted,” followed by a song by a certain 23-year-old that Mandy *really* likes (I am NOT kidding), followed by Evanescence’s “Hello.” Then later on I played “Renegade,” which was awesome. She says she’ll probably ask me to come on again sometime.


     


    WARNING: The rest of this post is extremely long, probably the longest post I’ve ever done. If you’re not a movie buff, the rest of this post probably won’t interest you, so you may leave now if you wish (but you can still comment, obviously). The rest of you, prepare to devote some time to reading…


     


    As a little bit of Day-Before-Oscars fun, I decided to give you some Oscar history, namely all the previous winners for Best Picture (in case you were wondering), along with my take on the ones I’ve seen. There are times where I want to comment on one or more, but I can never find the right way to segue it into my normal posts, so I’ll bunch them all together. If I don’t provide commentary for a movie, you can just assume I haven’t seen it (and feel free to weigh in with your own opinions). Actually, I may comment on some films I haven’t seen, if I have something to say about them (but I will note that I haven’t seen them).


     


    1928: Wings


    1929: The Broadway Melody


    1930: All Quiet on the Western Front


    1931: Cimarron


    1932: Grand Hotel


    1933: Cavalcade


    1934: It Happened One Night


    1935: Mutiny on the Bounty


    1936: The Great Ziegfeld


    1937: The Life of Emile Zola


    1938: You Can’t Take It With You


    1939: Gone With the Wind


    This is the “earliest” Best Picture winner I’ve seen. I know that Gone With the Wind is a classic and all, but it gets tedious really fast to me. I just don’t have the patience to sit through a four-hour-long soap opera. I’m not passing judgment on anyone else, though.


    1940: Rebecca


    1941: How Green Was My Valley


    1942: Mrs. Miniver


    1943: Casablanca


    1944: Going My Way


    1945: The Lost Weekend


    1946: The Best Years Of Our Lives


    1947: Gentleman’s Agreement


    1948: Hamlet


    1949: All the King’s Men


    1950: All About Eve


    1951: An American in Paris


    1952: The Greatest Show On Earth


    1953: From Here to Eternity


    1954: On the Waterfront


    1955: Marty


    1956: Around the World in 80 Days


    1957: The Bridge on the River Kwai


    1958: Gigi


    1959: Ben-Hur


    1960: The Apartment


    1961: West Side Story


    I’ve seen this movie, but it was a long time ago, so I don’t remember it that much, just that I wanted so badly to like the song “Somewhere,” but the woman’s voice drove me nuts. I said sometime last year that I finally found a decent version of it (different singers, of course), but I only have a video file of it and I can’t find an MP3. Oh well. Such is life.


    1962: Lawrence of Arabia


    1963: Tom Jones


    1964: My Fair Lady


    I didn’t see this movie until my senior year of high school. We watched it in class. I’ve found that it’s a fun movie to watch with a group of girls because it’s easy to get into that male-bashing frame of mind.


     


    1965: The Sound of Music


    Wow, it’s been soooo long since I’ve seen this movie. I used to watch it all the time when I was little. I remember the first time I watched it, actually. I was about three, and my grandma wanted to show it to me, but she kept calling it “Maria,” (after the main character). For some odd reason, I thought Maria was an evil Muppet (I might have been watching Sesame Street when she told me about it, and maybe I identified it with whatever was playing at that particular moment), and I wasn’t interested. She finally got me to watch it, and it became a staple of my childhood. As a sidenote, my grandparents have been to the real Von Trapp mansion in Austria, the place where the movie was made (in Switzerland), and the lodge in Vermont that the Von Trapp family runs or used to run (I think they even met some of the Von Trapps).


    1966: A Man For All Seasons


    1967: In the Heat of the Night


    1968: Oliver!


    I don’t remember a whole lot of the movie (though I did see it). What I do remember is being in our middle school production of it. I didn’t have a speaking role (except in the dress rehearsal, when I was filling in for someone else who had one line). I do remember that I had been given a singing part in one song, but at the next rehearsal, they seemed to forget this and auditioned other people, but they wouldn’t let me audition again. They ended up giving the thing to someone else. I wasn’t the only one they did this to, though. It did convince me that I preferred being in small plays instead of musicals, though. The reason I don’t act in Denison productions anymore is that the amount of control I had as an actor in high school doesn’t exist here. For instance, in high school I was able to pretty much choose my own costume. Here at Denison you don’t even see your costume until a few days before opening night, and if you even make so much as a friendly suggestion, you are putting your life in your hands. You will most likely get yelled at. I got to the point where that just wasn’t fun, and I decided to mostly stick to tech stuff.


    1969: Midnight Cowboy


    1970: Patton


    1971: The French Connection


    1972: The Godfather


    1973: The Sting


    This is the “earliest” Oscar winner that I own on DVD (or video, for that matter). It probably has one of the tightest scripts ever. There is almost not a single second wasted, and everything is important to some degree. This movie’s win was also the first time a female producer won Best Picture (Julia Phillips, who co-produced with her husband and someone else).


    1974: The Godfather Part II


    1975: One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest


    1976: Rocky


    1977: Annie Hall


    I haven’t seen this one, but how could any Woody Allen possibly be better than Star Wars? Sorry, I just don’t find him funny.


    1978: The Deer Hunter


    1979: Kramer vs. Kramer


    1980: Ordinary People


    1981: Chariots of Fire


    1982: Gandhi


    1983: Terms of Endearment


    1984: Amadeus


    1985: Out of Africa


    1986: Platoon


    1987: The Last Emperor


    1988: Rain Man


    1989: Driving Miss Daisy


    I haven’t seen this movie, but I would just like to say that this was the first Academy Awards I watched. All I remember is the big dance number for “Under the Sea” and that The Little Mermaid won something. We taped part of it, but I think it got taped over. Strangely enough, I didn’t watch the Oscars again for two years.


    1990: Dances with Wolves


    I’ve seen this, but it was a long time ago and I don’t remember much of it.


    1991: The Silence of the Lambs


    When this first won Best Picture, I was extremely pissed off that Beauty and the Beast lost to it (it was the only animated film nominated for Best Picture). I was also eight years old. Now I think it’s a great movie. However, I think this is what started my tendency to become antagonistic toward the front-runner simply for being the front-runner (unless the front-runner is my top pick, but that rarely happens; in that case I get antagonistic towards the movie that has the best chance at upsetting the front-runner). But I digress.


    1992: Unforgiven


    1993: Schindler’s List


    1994: Forrest Gump


    This is one of the few movies that managed to eventually shake off my “front-runner antagonization” tendency (but not until way after it won), and now I think it’s a wonderful movie. I later found out that The Shawshank Redemption was also nominated that year, and I like Shawshank better, but I don’t really feel bad about it. If your pick’s gotta lose, the winner should be a good movie.


    1995: Braveheart


    1996: The English Patient


    1997: Titanic


    Until this year, this was the only time my pick was the front-runner. I still think people are being unfair to James Cameron for the “I’m the king of the world” line (if you’re interested, he was quoting the movie). It’s also kind of unfair that it’s become so popular to hate this movie (mostly because it was popular). Apparently you can only like this movie and remain credible if you were not a teenage girl when you saw it. Unfortunately, it happened to come out when I was fifteen, which puts me in that category even though I did not have the same motive as most of the other teenage girls. I saw it because I was interested in the Titanic itself (I had seen a movie from the fifties called A Night to Remember many times beforehand). I also saw the day after it came out, before all the box office and Oscar buzz started, so maybe that had something to do with it. I still like it, although not nearly as much as I used to and I haven’t seen it in at least three years. Then again, I’m sensing some cinema purist action behind this hate campaign.


    1998: Shakespeare in Love


    This is one of the few purely romantic movies I like (probably because it’s so intelligently written). I was as happy about this Academy Awards as the previous year’s, but for the exact opposite reason. This time my pick was not the front-runner, but it pulled the upset and won. I remember everyone predicting Saving Private Ryan, but Shakespeare in Love pulled through and won. Awesome.


    1999: American Beauty


    This one is kind of strange. I saw it on the recommendation of a friend of mine, and I had a weird reaction to it. I can see why it was so heavily praised, and I totally agree with it winning Best Picture. By critical standards, it is a good movie. However, I personally do not like it. Does that make any sense at all? It makes perfect sense to me, but I’m not sure I’m phrasing it really well.


    2000: Gladiator


    Unlike American Beauty, which I didn’t like but could see why it deserved to win Best Picture, I don’t get Gladiator at all. My pick that year had been Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon, which is a beautiful and well-choreographed movie. I didn’t see Gladiator until a couple months after it won Best Picture, but I wasn’t impressed. I could see Russell Crowe as Best Actor, but I don’t understand Best Picture because it wasn’t. It didn’t even come close. People kept talking about how character-driven it was, but I couldn’t care less about the characters. I didn’t have any interest in any of them. I just don’t get why it would ever win Best Picture. Crouching Tiger got robbed.


    2001: A Beautiful Mind


    This was one of those times that I tried desperately to fight off the “antagonize” tendency before the ceremony, even though I hadn’t seen the movie, because I got the feeling that I might like it. My pick was for Fellowship of the Ring, of course, but I didn’t mind so much when A Beautiful Mind won. I didn’t get to see the movie for several months, but my urge to fight off the “antagonize” was justified, as it’s a very good movie, very touching and yet very interestingly portrayed (although there is starting to be a backlash to this as well).


    2002: Chicago


    My pick last year was for Two Towers, but it was clear that Chicago would win in almost every realistic scenario. As such, I started to antagonize it, but this time I tried to head it off by seeing it before the Oscars. It didn’t get rid of it completely, but I wasn’t pissed when it won, which is good enough for me. I still don’t quite understand what about it makes it Best Picture, but I’m sure there’s something (unlike Gladiator). I mean, it’s fun and I like it, but I’m not sure what it was that got it the award.


     


     


    Oh my God, that was long. You’re probably really bored by now (if you haven’t already fallen asleep), so I’ll see you tomorrow when I reveal my pick for Best Picture (although you probably already know what it is).


     


     

  • BEST ACTOR


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Johnny Depp (Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl)

    • Ben Kingsley (House of Sand and Fog)

    • Jude Law (Cold Mountain)

    • Bill Murray (Lost in Translation)

    • Sean Penn (Mystic River)

     


    Erin’s Pick: Johnny Depp (Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl)


    Marisa’s Pick: Johnny Depp (Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl)


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Adrien Brody (The Pianist)


     


    This pick shouldn’t surprise you. This also seems to be the only acting category that doesn’t have a unanimous (or near-unanimous) prediction from the critics. I’d say roughly 60% are saying Penn, while the other 40% are saying Bill Murray. However, several I read have mentioned that there is a slight (key word “slight”) chance that the Academy will split the vote between Penn and Murray, and Johnny Depp will win. One critic actually predicted Depp outright, with exactly that scenario. She’s a lot more optimistic than I am, but Johnny Depp did win the SAG award last week (yay).


     


    By the way, if you’re into browsing last-minute Oscar predictions, this chart probably has the most links I’ve found in one place. Have fun!


     

  • BEST ACTRESS


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Keisha Castle-Hughes (Whale Rider)

    • Diane Keaton (Something’s Gotta Give)

    • Samantha Morton (In America)

    • Charlize Theron (Monster)

    • Naomi Watts (21 Grams)

     


    Erin’s Pick: Keisha Castle-Hughes (Whale Rider)


    Marisa’s Pick: Diane Keaton (Something’s Gotta Give)


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Nicole Kidman (The Hours)


     


    Just about every critic I’ve read is handing this one to Charlize Theron on a silver platter. It seems the Academy loves it when pretty women get ugly for a role (Hilary Swank, Nicole Kidman, etc). I went for Keisha Castle-Hughes because Whale Rider is really the only movie in this list that I’ve got any interest at all in seeing.

  • BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Alec Baldwin (The Cooler)
    • Benicio Del Toro (21 Grams)
    • Djimon Hounsou (In America)
    • Tim Robbins (Mystic River)
    • Ken Watanabe (The Last Samurai)

     


    Erin’s Pick: Tim Robbins (Mystic River)


    Marisa’s Pick: Benicio Del Toro (21 Grams)


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Chris Cooper (Adaptation)


     


    I'm still disappointed that Sean Astin didn't get nominated, because he really deserved it, but I still have to choose somebody. I don’t really plan on seeing Mystic River, but I haven’t seen any of these movies, so I’ll give it to Tim Robbins since he didn’t get one for The Shawshank Redemption (actually, he wasn’t even nominated for that).


     


    ---


     


    I wrote an article for the Denisonian this week, by the way, but I’ll probably wait until tomorrow to post it, because I have to type it up (since a couple things were changed), and it’s kind of long.


     


    By the way, Marisa, there aren’t that many Indian students in my Economics class. I know the girl who gave the lecture about being rude is Indian, and the guy who burped is an international student (although I don’t know what country he’s from), but everyone else in the class is American. Then again, this is ECON 101 that I’m taking, which just about all Econ majors would take their freshman year, and there are only seven freshmen from India (and at least four sections of ECON 101 each semester).


     


    Random weird thing overheard on campus (this was said by two sorority girls walking up the hill behind me):


     


    Girl #1: “So, is there a secret robot race of cute skinny blonde girls taking over the world?”


    Girl #2: “Yes.”

  • BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Shohreh Aghdashloo (House of Sand and Fog)
    • Patricia Clarkson (Pieces of April)
    • Marcia Gay Harden (Mystic River)
    • Holly Hunter (Thirteen)
    • Renee Zellweger (Cold Mountain)

     


    Erin’s Pick: Holly Hunter (Thirteen)


    Marisa’s Pick: Patricia Clarkson (Pieces of April)


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Catherine Zeta-Jones (Chicago)


     


    I was pretty much being arbitrary on this one. Marisa was torn between Patricia Clarkson and Holly Hunter, so I told her to take Clarkson and I’d take Hunter. Odds are it won’t matter because every movie critic in existence is giving it to Renee Zellweger right now.


     


    On a related note, the cinema purists strike again. I quote part of an article in the Denisonian, in which the purist gives his take on what movie should win Best Picture:


     


    Return of the King relies too heavily on too many ‘feel-good’ techniques to stir viewers’ emotions. Similar to the book upon which it is based, there are several contrived scenes and predictable, clichéd lines of dialogue. While these elements are not necessarily bad in and of themselves, they certainly at least should be enough to hurt the film in comparison of Lost in Translation. There is also something to be said about original material being more impressive than an adaptation of a tried and proven winner.”


     


    This person is obviously forgetting that when Tolkien’s books were first published, they were really the first stories to take on that genre (hell, they probably were the beginning of that genre). Although I’ve not read the books and never plan to (sorry, but I’m already planning on reading too much as it is), I will admit that most every fantasy book, movie, and TV show owes at least some part of their inspiration to Tolkien. There’s nothing wrong with that (my mom is always saying there’s no such thing as an original idea). What I’m saying is that the so-called “contrived scenes” and “predictable and clichéd dialogue” (although it did not seem contrived or clichéd to me) only seem that way because we are used to seeing that sort of thing from movies and books that came after Lord of the Rings was published. As for relying on “feel-good” techniques, since when did a movie have to be depressing to be good? I could accuse a bunch of movies the cinema purists praise as relying too heavily on “making-the-audience-feel-depressed” techniques. As for the “original vs. adaptation” argument, that is a debate that has been occurring for decades. What I believe is that one method should not automatically be held as more “artistically favorable” over the other (This is why they have separate Oscar categories for Original and Adapted Screenplays). Both methods have different advantages and different challenges. In an “original” setting, your challenge is to make it stand out from the rest of the crowd. In an “adapted” setting, your challenge is to bring the written word (usually) to life while still remaining faithful to source. Both are incredibly and equally difficult. In the case of Return of the King, I consider it to be a great success in part BECAUSE it is an adaptation. Like I’ve said, I have not read the books, but I’ve seen such positive vibes coming from the Tolkien fans that I believe it must have been done right.


     


    I’ll post a less specific rant about cinema purists later (and yes, I do frequently have a bone to pick with them; just ask Chris). On another related note, my parents saw Lost in Translation over the weekend and hated it.


     


    Another Mardi Gras goes by without paczkis. I miss them terribly. It seems no one outside of Toledo knows what they are, and I'm not that good at describing them.


     


    Well, I’ve gone on long enough, so I’ll talk more tomorrow. Happy Mardi Gras.

  • BEST ANIMATED FEATURE


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Brother Bear
    • Finding Nemo
    • The Triplets of Belleville

     


    Erin’s Pick: Finding Nemo


    Marisa’s Pick: Finding Nemo


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Spirited Away


     


    Is there really anything I need to say about this? Finding Nemo was definitely the best of the Pixar films, and by the look of things, Disney will finally get its first Animated Feature Oscar.


     


    ---


     


    Can I say that a lot of the people in my Economics class are annoying? First of all, the class is mostly a bunch of vocabulary and a little math. That’s it. No hard concepts or anything, and yet 90% of the class just don’t get it. The slightest thing gets them confused, and meanwhile I’m stuck wondering what’s so hard to understand about vocabulary words. Then half of them spend the class acting like idiots. For example, this is what happened today:



    • The girl sitting behind me kept going on and on about her male friend trying to steal her pledge book and how she’d get in big trouble with her sorority if he did because the stuff in it is supposed to be secret.
    • The guy sitting next to me spent most of the class reading a Maxim magazine. Occasionally he’d show one of the pictures to the girls behind him and they’d all start laughing.
    • At one point, the guy sitting on the other side of me burped, and the girl next to him starting giving him this lecture about how rude he was since he didn’t say “Excuse me.” The two then proceeded to get into an argument about it until the guy started hiccupping, at which point the girl started giggling. Then someone sitting behind them answered a question that our professor asked, and the girl started complaining to the guy about how much she couldn’t stand the person who answered the question.
    • The girl sitting across from me stared at Maxim boy’s shoes for the ENTIRE CLASS PERIOD. Her eyes never moved once.

     


    I’m starting to feel like I’m back in my high school Modern World History class. Actually, there were some entertaining moments today. The window was open, and at one point during class we heard this really LOUD sneeze coming from outside, and my professor yelled “Bless you” out the window.


     


    Liz and I went swimming again tonight, and I still smell like chlorine, even though I took a shower afterwards. I've actually built up my swimming strength faster than I thought I'd be able to (It's been a loooooong time since I went swimming, and I wasn't that strong at it to start with), to the point where I can a couple laps without getting TOO tired (my mom would flip if she knew that). We're trying to make a habit of going swimming a couple times a week.


     


    Well, I guess that’s all for today. I'm going to bed now. I love the feeling you have when you're falling asleep after swimming. Bye.


     

  • BEST ADAPTED SCREENPLAY


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • American Splendor

    • City of God

    • The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

    • Mystic River

    • Seabiscuit

     


    Erin’s Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King


    Marisa’s Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: The Pianist


     


    Marisa would be more of an authority on this than I, since she’s read the book and I have not. However, I figure they must’ve done something right, judging from the overwhelming praise of the Tolkien nerds…

  • BEST ORIGINAL SCREENPLAY


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • The Barbarian Invasions

    • Dirty Pretty Things

    • Finding Nemo

    • In America

    • Lost In Translation

     


    Erin’s Pick: Finding Nemo


    Marisa’s Pick: In America


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Talk to Her


     


    Marisa picked In America because she thought the story itself was the most “original” of the group, even though “Original Screenplay” simply means the script was not based on any specific work that was previously published (such as a book or short story). I picked Finding Nemo because I thought it was very cleverly written for a “family” movie.


     


    ---


     


    I've been seeing these "Visited Countries" and "Visited States" maps all over Xanga for a while now, so I thought I'd take a stab at it, if you to demonstrate to you my desperate desire to travel more.


     


    I'll start with the more pathetic map first: Visited Countries


     



    create your own visited country map or write about it on the open travel guide


    Kind of sad, isn't it?


     


    Now, Visited States:



    create your own visited states map or write about it on the open travel guide


    That's a little better, although I really need to get out of this time zone eventually. I don't remember anything about Pennsylvania because I was asleep the entire time I was there (both times, actually), and I was only in New Jersey for about 10 minutes (basically, we got off the ferry, walked down a corridor, and got right back on the ferry). What's really pathetic is that I haven't been out of Ohio in almost three years, and that was only a 20 minute detour into Michigan after Chris made a wrong turn when we were leaving prom. I'm not sure if the trip to Disney World this summer will add any states to the list or not. I know it would have with the original flight we had, because that would've been Toledo to Chicago to Orlando, but the flight got changed when my mom and Laura made the reservations. Now it's Detroit to Cincinnati to Orlando, and on the way back, Orlando to Atlanta to Detroit. Is there any specific way of knowing which states you fly over? For all I know I could pass over parts of Virgina and North Carolina, and to me, that counts as having been there. You can tell I've never flown before.


     

  • BEST ART DIRECTION


     


    The Nominees Are:



    • Girl With a Pearl Earring

    • The Last Samurai

    • The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King

    • Master and Commander: The Far Side of the World

    • Seabiscuit

     


    Erin’s Pick: The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King


    Marisa’s Pick: Girl With a Pearl Earring


     


    The Winner Last Year Was: Chicago